Laporta's comment about Tebas's sick obsession does not ring true

Laporta's comment about Tebas's sick obsession does not ring true

| sport

Messi's departure was not because of economics, it appears

You are reading, you know by now, a true heretic: a person who denies some of the established dogmas of a religion. For example, the culé, the cruyffista, the idea that you can only play one way, with certain players, and that everything else is sin. Parenthesis: I do not deny the dogmas, I question them.

I make this introduction because I was one of the first to defend the thesis of Carles Tusquets and Óscar Grau: we had to start the post-Messi era as soon as possible, sell him after the burofax for 100 million euros, save the 138 million euros left on his wages and start from zero.

What hurts me is that if Joan Laporta, Eduard Romeu, vice president and main guarantor of the president, and Ferran Reverter, whom even the president of LaLiga, Javier Tebas, has just pointed out as the culprit for Messi leaving, thought the same, they do not say it. Well, the president (as always) let slip: "We have decided to advance the plans we had if Messi left by two years.”

After 114 press conferences, no one believes Laporta about Messi's departure. The last thing he said, that Tebas "has a sick obsession with us", does not ring true.

Topics with the letter